10s of millions isn't even a rounding error in the context of AI-related spending.

beautiful

Related tangent: Brave is pretty close to Chrome, sans Google.

I mean, so is Edge. I can't say I feel more comfortable with them. Probably the most direct thing I can point to for Brave is that having cryptocurrency features in a browser doesn't give trustworthy vibes. And yes I realize there's a reason for it and there's a fairly high chance the vibes could be giving the wrong impression here, but when your entire digital life is at stake, that raises the bar for the risks you want to take. Whatever you think of Chrome or Google, the reality is that they're known quantities and I'm already using them, like most other people.

robbyrussell, creator of oh-my-zsh?

1. thank you for omz, it's great

2. how is it possible you've been on HN for over 15 years and have just 254 karma?

Lurkers abound.

> "My ideal software has a well designed and thought through user interface for the primary interactions, allowing me to think about the goal I'm trying to achieve"

Yes, this is the crux of the whole discussion. The paradigm is called "Intent-based UX".

You'll want to strongly consider rebranding with a different name. Way too easily confused.

It's not impossible (and I'd substitute "evolved" for "designed").

Yes, wanting "More" [time, money, love, status] is pretty firmly ingrained as an advantageous trait. But you can override your instincts (e.g. declining a drink when thirsty, if you learn the glass of water contains poison). And it is possible to learn to want what you already have.

How? Practice three things: Compassion, Attention, and Gratitude. (Pick any two, and the third will follow almost automatically.)

That's the central thesis of an excellent book, "How to Want What You Have" by Dr Timothy Miller. It changed my life.

The title of that book is marvelous and packs a lot into just 6 words.

Split the difference and say “designed by evolution?” I think designed captures something important and doesn’t have to imply a non-materialist view.

"Let's eat, grandma!" vs "Let's eat grandma!"

You might be interested in smolvm microvms from https://smolmachines.com - which (unlike Docker) provide kernel-level isolation (among other benefits). No affiliation, just a happy user.

I'm not the person you replied to, but your response misses their point: rollout issue aside, the approach is flawed by design. The feature author didn't address that at all.

The person had something else before they edited. They were overly negative, saying (from my memory) that it was inexcusable, and they had enough, pointing to malice.

The response as it is now sounds fair. Before that it was not.

Ah, thanks for clarifying. (And shame on the GP.)

My only edit was to continue refuting at the beginning of the sentence that Claude Code's use of remote control to control agent.md is still incorrect. The rest is identical to the original, and my attitude before and after has not changed.

As for whatever "had enough" he mentioned, I'm not sure whether he said it on purpose or genuinely misremembered.

Since that's how he remembers it, so be it. I can't be bothered to explain anymore.

I must have misremembered. I wish you kept the original though.

Because "Even if this was an honest rollout mistake" this is a new addition, changes meaning quite a bit.

I disagree with what you wrote now partially (your comment on claude), but it does sound fair, and i wouldn't have written what i wrote.